
A Teacher
Rupert Sheldrake
Morphic resonance / fields
The transmission
Rupert Sheldrake (born 1942) is a British biologist with impeccable establishment credentials—a Cambridge PhD in biochemistry, a fellowship at Clare College, and research on plant development—who became one of the most prominent and controversial scientific heretics of the late twentieth century.
Dissatisfied with the purely genetic and mechanistic account of how organisms develop their forms, he proposed in A New Science of Life (1981) a radical alternative that drew immediate hostility from the mainstream (the journal Nature notoriously called it “a book for burning”).
Sheldrake’s contribution to the consciousness-and-physics frontier is the hypothesis of morphic resonance: the claim that nature is shaped not only by fixed laws but by habits accumulated in “morphic fields,” so that once a pattern (a crystal structure, a behavior, a learned task) appears, similar systems everywhere become more likely to adopt it, through a non-local influence across space and time.
This reframes memory and form as field-like and collective rather than locally stored, providing the mind-power lineage with a scientific-sounding mechanism for non-local connection, collective memory, and the idea that minds and patterns can influence one another without physical contact.
Though his experiments (on the “sense of being stared at,” telepathy in animals, and similar) remain rejected by mainstream science, they became influential in holistic and New Age thought.
What they gave
Morphic resonance: Proposes that patterns, once established, propagate non-locally, supplying a quasi-mechanism for collective memory and influence at a distance.
- Morphic fields: Frames form and behavior as governed by field-like organizing structures rather than only local genetic instructions.
- Nature as habit, not fixed law: Reframes natural regularities as accumulated habits, opening conceptual room for change and influence.
- Testable (if contested) claims: Attempts to bring non-local mind-effects into an experimental frame, lending the idea a scientific posture.
In their words
The science delusion is the belief that science already understands the nature of reality in principle, leaving only the details to be filled in.
Why should we assume that all the Laws of Nature were already present at the instant of the Big Bang, like a cosmic Napoleonic code?
The line they stand in
Taught by / Influenced by: Henri Bergson’s élan vital and memory theory; developmental and organismic biology; Goethean holistic science; Whitehead’s process philosophy.
- Taught / Influenced: consciousness studies and parapsychology; New Age and holistic discourse; modern “collective field,” “100th monkey,” and morphic-field manifestation ideas.
Revelations they taught
Essential Works
- A New Science of Life1981
- The Presence of the Past1988
- Science Set Free (The Science Delusion)2012