The Teachers
Thomas Nagel

A Teacher

Thomas Nagel

b. 1937 Idealism & Process Philosophy Analytic Philosophy of Mind

The irreducibility of subjective experience

Thomas Nagel (b. 1937, Belgrade) is an American philosopher, long associated with New York University, and one of the most influential figures in late-twentieth-century analytic philosophy of mind, ethics, and political theory.

His 1974 paper “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” (published in The Philosophical Review, later collected in Mortal Questions, 1979) became one of the most cited works in the field. Its argument is deceptively simple: there is something it is like, subjectively, to be a conscious organism, and this first-person character of experience cannot be captured by any purely objective, third-person physical description.

We cannot know what it is like to perceive the world through a bat’s echolocation, and no amount of neuroscience closes that gap. The essay crystallized the modern problem of consciousness and the notion of “qualia.” Nagel is a careful, secular philosopher, not a spiritual or mind-power thinker, and that distinction matters here.

In The View from Nowhere (1986) he explored the tension between subjective and objective standpoints, and in his controversial Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False (2012) he argued that consciousness, cognition, and value resist explanation within a strictly physicalist, neo-Darwinian framework, gesturing toward a non-reductive or teleological naturalism without endorsing theism.

Mind and Cosmos drew sharp criticism from many scientists and philosophers and remains a minority, speculative position; it is honest to present it as a serious dissent within philosophy, not a settled result.

Tier: legitimate philosophy (mainstream on consciousness, contested and speculative on anti-Darwinism).

The subjectivity argument: “What is it like to be a bat?” gives the consciousness-first worldview its most quotable philosophical anchor — experience as irreducible to matter.

  • Qualia and the explanatory gap: Helped make the felt character of experience a central problem science had not dissolved, indirectly lending credibility to non-physicalist views.
  • Anti-reductionism: Mind and Cosmos argues mainstream materialism may be incomplete — a stance idealist and consciousness-first writers cite, though Nagel proposes no manifestation claim.
  • Boundary marker: A rigorous case that acknowledging an explanatory gap is not evidence for any particular metaphysics, let alone mind-over-matter.

Influenced by: Wittgenstein and the linguistic tradition; John Rawls (under whom he studied); analytic philosophy of mind and its realism about the subjective.

  • Influenced: David Chalmers (the “hard problem” builds directly on Nagel’s subjectivity argument); the panpsychism revival; contemporary anti-reductionist philosophy of mind.

Essential Works

  • What Is It Like to Be a Bat?1974
  • The View from Nowhere1986
  • Mind and Cosmos2012

Their lineage

↑ who shaped them David Chal…a source — none before ↓ who they shaped
See them in the Lineage →