The Teachers

A Teacher

Wolfgang Giegerich

1942-present Jungian / Analytical Psychology Archetypal (Post-Jungian) Psychology

Psychology as the discipline of interiority

Wolfgang Giegerich (born 1942) is a German Jungian analyst and theorist who has developed one of the most rigorous and controversial currents within post-Jungian thought, which he calls “psychology as the discipline of interiority.” Trained in the Jungian tradition and a practicing analyst near Munich, he is the author of a large body of work, including his major theoretical statement The Soul’s Logical Life: Towards a Rigorous Notion of Psychology and the multi-volume Collected English Papers (whose titles include The Neurosis of Psychology, Technology and the Soul, Soul-Violence, and What Is Soul?).

Drawing heavily on Hegel’s dialectical logic alongside Jung, Giegerich argues that the proper subject of psychology is the soul or “objective psyche” itself, not the personal ego, and that psychological life must be grasped as a self-moving logical process rather than as a set of empirical or clinical facts.

Giegerich’s relevance to this lineage is twofold. First, he stands as a deepening and radicalizing of the imaginal and soul-centered stream that runs through Jung and James Hillman: he insists that the soul has its own interior logic and that thinking the image “all the way through” — not merely sticking to it as a picture — is the true work of psychology.

Second, he is a famously rigorous critic of Hillman’s archetypal psychology and of much popular “soul” and self-development discourse, charging it with sentimentality, literalism, and a failure to follow the psychological movement to its logical conclusion.

His insistence on what he calls the “psychological difference” — the distinction between literal, positivistic reality and the interior, self-relating life of the soul — makes him both an heir to and a sharp corrective within the depth-psychological tradition, prizing inner gnosis and the autonomous life of imagination while refusing any easy, ego-flattering use of them.

Psychology as the discipline of interiority: Reframed psychology’s true subject as the self-moving logical life of the soul rather than the personal ego or empirical behavior.

  • The “psychological difference”: Articulated the distinction between literal/positivistic reality and the interior, self-relating reality of the soul, sharpening what it means to think psychologically.
  • Hegelian turn in depth psychology: Brought Hegel’s dialectical logic to bear on Jung, treating images and symptoms as moments in a self-developing logical process to be “thought through” rather than merely observed.
  • Rigorous critique of archetypal psychology: Offered a sustained, demanding critique of Hillman’s archetypal psychology and of sentimental, literalist “soul” and self-help discourse, acting as an internal corrective to the tradition.

Giegerich works directly out of the depth-psychological lineage founded by C. G. Jung and extended by James Hillman, while subjecting both to a thoroughgoing Hegelian critique; his thought thus carries the Jungian concern with soul, image, and the objective psyche into a more rigorously logical and dialectical register.

He influenced by Jung’s notion of the objective psyche, by Hillman’s archetypal and imaginal psychology (which he both builds upon and sharply criticizes), and by the philosophical tradition of Hegel and German Idealism.

In turn he has shaped a distinct school within contemporary analytical psychology — the “discipline of interiority” movement — and the ongoing scholarly debates around the future and self-understanding of Jungian psychology.

Essential Works

  • The Soul's Logical Life: Towards a Rigorous Notion of Psychology1998
  • The Neurosis of Psychology (Collected English Papers, Vol. 1)2005
  • Technology and the Soul (Collected English Papers, Vol. 2)2007
  • Soul-Violence (Collected English Papers, Vol. 3)2008
  • What Is Soul?2012

Their lineage

↑ who shaped them Carl JungG.W.F. Heg…James Hill…no recorded heirs yet ↓ who they shaped
See them in the Lineage →